Accreditation Management Software for Maritime Registers
Collect applications with evidence, review them in stages, issue a verifiable seal and give clients member verification in seconds, from your own register.

Who this is for
- You admit members only after checking evidence: certificates, experience and references
- You publish a register of accredited surveyors, approved crew or captains, recognised training providers or approved suppliers
- Owners, brokers or insurers ask you to confirm that someone is really on your register
- Applications arrive by email with PDFs attached, and reviewers work from forwarded threads
- Certificates such as STCW, MCA or RYA expire and you find out when a client does
A register is only worth what a stranger can trust. When a yacht owner hires a surveyor, a management company takes on a captain or an insurer accepts a report, the question is the same: is this person really accredited by the body they name, today? Certifying bodies and professional registers in the maritime sector exist to answer that question, and most of them still answer it by hand.
Behind the public list there is usually an inbox of applications with attachments, a spreadsheet tracking who has reviewed what, references chased by phone, a committee decision recorded in the minutes and a PDF of the register exported a few times a year. Each step works; the chain between the steps does not. A lapsed member stays on the PDF, a logo keeps appearing on a website after membership ended, and a client who wants to check has to email the secretariat and wait.
SupaMaritime Guild is professional register software built around that chain: the application with its evidence, the review with assigned reviewers and references, the decision, a verifiable seal, qualifications with expiry dates and a public verification page that answers from the live record. It is accreditation management software designed for maritime bodies, not a certificate template bolted onto a generic tool.
Where the day breaks down
Applications live in an inbox
Forms arrive as email attachments in different formats. Certificates, CVs and proof of experience are scattered across threads, and the complete file for one applicant exists only in someone's memory.
Reviewers work from forwarded emails
Each reviewer gets a copy and comments in a reply, then the secretariat merges the opinions by hand. Nobody can see at a glance which applications are waiting on whom, or at which step.
References are chased by phone
Referees are asked by email, forget, and are reminded manually. When a reference finally arrives, it is saved somewhere other than the application it belongs to.
The register is a PDF that ages
The published list is exported a few times a year. Between exports it shows members who have lapsed and leaves out members approved last week.
Verification means emailing the office
A client who wants to confirm an accreditation writes to the secretariat and waits. A copied logo on a website looks exactly like a genuine one, and nobody knows how often people try to check.
Certificate expiry goes unnoticed
STCW, MCA, RYA and national licences carry expiry dates. Without a register that tracks them, an expired certificate is discovered by a client, not by the body that vouched for its holder.
Built around the workflow, not bolted on top
SupaMaritime Guild follows an accreditation from the first form to the public check. The application, its documents, references, reviews and decision stay on one record; approval creates the membership and issues a seal; and the seal points to a verification page that reads the membership status at the moment someone checks.
Online applications with evidence and references
Application forms you design, with document uploads and qualification fields. Drafts save automatically and applicants resume from a link. Referees answer through a personal link, without an account, and the request can be resent from the file.
Review stages with assigned reviewers
Define up to eight stages, such as office check, references and committee decision. Assigned reviewers see only their applications and record a checklist review. Approval is possible only from the final stage; rejection from any stage.
Needs-info loop and a recorded decision
Ask the applicant for what is missing and resume at the same stage when it arrives. The decision creates the membership, copies qualifications and documents to the member record, issues the seal and invites the member to the portal.
Verifiable seal and public verification page
Every approved member gets a seal linked to a public page that shows, live, whether the membership is in good standing, with tier and good-standing date. Every check is logged, and staff can rotate a code to revoke the old one.
Qualifications register with expiry reminders
STCW, MCA, RYA and national certificates with documents and expiry dates. Tabs for expiring, expired and to check; staff verify or reject; your team is reminded at 90, 30 and 7 days and on the expiry day.
A register you can embed and people can trust
A public directory that shows only what member consent and your visibility rules allow, your own member fields, an approval queue for profile edits, seal and apply widgets for your website, and an audit log.
An illustrative register of accredited yacht surveyors: before and after
Illustrative example with a fictional body. A national association of marine surveyors keeps a register of accredited yacht surveyors used by owners, brokers and insurers. Applications arrive steadily, each needing proof of qualifications, two professional references and a committee decision, and clients ask the office by email to confirm accreditations.
Before SupaMaritime
After SupaMaritime
An applicant emails a form, a CV and scanned certificates; the missing insurance certificate arrives a week later in a separate email and is filed elsewhere.
The applicant fills in the online form, uploads documents, saves a draft and completes it later: the whole file is in one place.
The secretariat forwards the file to two committee members, who reply with comments in separate threads.
The application enters the first stage, office check. Two committee members are assigned and see only the applications assigned to them.
Referees are emailed, one does not answer, and the reminder is a phone call that leaves no trace.
Referees receive a personal link and answer without an account; a late request is resent from the application.
The committee approves the applicant in a meeting; the register PDF on the website changes at the next quarterly export.
A missing document triggers a needs-info request; the applicant adds it and the review resumes at the same stage, then advances to committee decision.
A yacht owner emails to ask whether the surveyor named on a report is accredited, and waits for the office to reply.
Approval at the final stage creates the membership, issues the seal and invites the surveyor to the portal; the seal verifies as valid from that moment, and the directory profile appears once the member agrees to be listed.
A surveyor's certificate expires, and the association hears about it months later from a client.
The owner opens the seal link and sees, live, that the membership is in good standing; the check is logged. Staff are reminded at 90, 30 and 7 days before a certificate expires.
Facts you can check
The verification page reads the membership status at the moment of the check: active or in grace shows valid; lapsed, suspended or a revoked code does not.
Days before a certificate expires when your team is notified, each threshold sent once per certificate.
Each verification is recorded with its outcome, time and referring page.
Stages you define for your procedure, such as office check, references and committee decision. Approval is possible only from the final stage.
What accreditation management software has to do for a maritime register
Accreditation is a chain of evidence. A marine surveyor, a yacht captain or a training provider applies; the body checks certificates, experience and references; a committee decides; and the decision becomes a public statement that clients rely on. Software for this job has to keep every link of that chain on one record, because the value of the register depends on being able to show why someone is on it.
In SupaMaritime Guild the application form is yours: the fields you need, document uploads, qualification fields tied to the qualification types you recognise, and the tier the applicant is applying for. Applicants save a draft and come back to it. References are requested by email with a personal link, and a reference that has not arrived can be requested again from the application.
Staff follow applications on a board or in a table, by status and stage, with the documents, references, reviews and timeline of each one. Once the form is submitted, nothing about the applicant needs to live in an inbox.


Member verification in seconds: how the seal works
When an application is approved, the member receives a seal: a short code linked to a public verification page on your register. With the seal widget, included on the Free plan, the member can show the seal on their own website, and the link can go on reports, proposals and email signatures.
Anyone who opens the page sees the answer that holds at that moment. It shows valid while the membership is active or in its grace period, with the member's name, tier, member-since date and good-standing date. It shows not valid when the membership has lapsed or been suspended, or when the code has been revoked. The page is never served from a cache, and every check is recorded with its outcome.
If a seal is copied or misused, staff rotate the code: the old one stops verifying and a new one is issued. A body that prints the verification link as a QR code on a plaque, a certificate or a survey report gives clients the same check from a phone, without calling the secretariat.
Review stages, reviewers and a decision you can explain
Every certifying body has its own procedure, usually written into a statute or regulation: an office check for completeness, a technical review of qualifications, references and a decision by a committee or council. Guild lets you define that procedure as up to eight review stages. An application in review sits in exactly one stage, advances step by step and can be approved only from the last one; an application that is plainly ineligible can be rejected at any point.
Reviewers are assigned per application, and a form can carry default reviewers. A reviewer sees only the applications assigned to them, records a review against a checklist (identity, qualifications, documents, references, fee tier) and checks each document. When something is missing, the application goes back to the applicant with a request for information and, once answered, resumes at the stage it left.
The decision closes the loop. Approval creates the membership, copies the applicant's qualifications and documents to the member record, issues the seal, invites the new member to the portal and emails the outcome; rejection emails the applicant with your message. Reviewers use staff seats, and a custom role such as a vetting committee can be limited to the applications it needs.


Keeping a professional register current after approval
Admission is the start, not the end. A register that clients trust has to reflect who is still qualified and still in good standing. In Guild each member's certificates sit in a qualifications register: STCW, MCA, RYA, ENG1 and national licences from a built-in catalogue, plus the types your body adds, each with a document and an expiry date. Members upload renewed certificates from their portal, and staff verify or reject them from the register.
The register has tabs for certificates expiring within 90 days, already expired, waiting to be checked, and all. Your team is notified at 90, 30 and 7 days before expiry and on the expiry day. Membership status drives the seal: when a membership lapses after its grace period, or staff suspend it, the verification page stops showing it as valid.
What the public sees is controlled field by field. Members choose to be listed and consent to a public profile; the association defines its own member fields, such as survey categories, licence class or areas covered, with visibility rules, and can require approval before edits to selected fields are published. Import from a spreadsheet or Wild Apricot with a dry run and a 24-hour undo, and export everything in open formats on every plan.
How this compares to the alternatives
Digital credentials platform for certificates and badges. A fit when the main need is issuing credentials; Guild focuses on the admission procedure and the member register behind the credential.
Digital badge platform used for professional credentials. Oriented to issuing and sharing badges rather than running applications, reviews and a public register.
Membership platform for associations and non-profits. Guild imports a Wild Apricot export with a dry run, which helps bodies that want to move their register.
Frequently asked questions
What is accreditation management software?
How does member verification work for clients and insurers?
Can every reviewer see every application?
How are references collected?
Does the seal confirm individual certificates such as STCW or MCA?
Can professional register software run alongside our current website?
Does Guild track CPD or handle complaints and disciplinary cases?
How much does it cost?
See it in your workflow, not a generic demo
We'll walk through built for certifying bodies and registers.
Start on Free at €0 with the seal widget; Pro at €199/month adds three staff seats for reviewers, the apply widget and your own domain.